Wednesday, January 21, 2026- As President Trump’s renewed focus on acquiring Greenland has dominated headlines, some advisers within his circle are expressing deep reservations about pursuing the Arctic territory through military means.
While Trump has framed Greenland’s strategic value as vital to national security, many of his advisers and allies reportedly do not support an armed takeover of a NATO partner’s territory and worry it could spark a geopolitical crisis. They argue that threatening military action could prove more damaging than productive and might undermine U.S. alliances.
The internal debate centers on whether there’s a practical, peaceful alternative — an “off‑ramp” that can achieve Trump’s strategic goals without jeopardizing international stability. Some advisers suggest leveraging economic pressure and diplomacy, including tariff threats or negotiated security arrangements, to coax Denmark and Greenland into expanded U.S. cooperation or concessions.
They believe the national-security benefits Trump seeks, particularly countering Russian and Chinese influence in the Arctic, could be achieved through enhanced bilateral agreements rather than outright control of the territory.
On the European side, figures like former Danish Prime Minister and NATO Secretary‑General Anders Fogh Rasmussen have publicly urged a firm yet pragmatic approach, encouraging Europe to offer diplomatic off‑ramps alongside strong economic and security assurances.
These proposals aim to preserve Denmark’s sovereignty over Greenland while giving the United States meaningful involvement in Arctic defense cooperation, potentially satisfying both sides without resorting to military escalation.
0 Comments