Friday, May 2, 2025 - Suspended Senator representing Kogi Central, Natasha Akpoti-Uduaghan, has ruled out an out-of-court settlement in her sexual harassment suit against Senate President Godswill Akpabio, insisting the matter must be resolved in court.
In a formal response to a letter from Akpabio’s legal
counsel, Olisa Agbakoba (SAN), dated April 30, 2025, Akpoti-Uduaghan maintained
that her claims represent the truth and that further comments will be reserved
for the courts, which alone have the jurisdiction to determine the matter.
She criticized Agbakoba for allegedly requesting evidence
outside the legal proceedings already filed before the High Court of the
Federal Capital Territory (Suit No. CV/816/25), in which Akpabio’s wife, Unoma,
is the complainant.
“The
assessment of evidence belongs to the courts. Your demand for evidence at your
client's behest suggests a fundamental misunderstanding of what constitutes
sexual harassment under global protocols,” she stated. “It reflects a narrow
view of a serious global issue. In my opinion, this is another attempt by your
client to trivialize the matter.”
She added that any further details would be disclosed only
through formal legal channels and in accordance with court directives, warning
that attempts to sidestep this process undermine the rule of law.
Akpoti-Uduaghan also condemned what she described as a media
campaign led by Agbakoba, allegedly on behalf of Akpabio, demanding proof
outside judicial procedures — a process she says Akpabio himself avoided by
leveraging his privileged Senate position
"A
litigant cannot seek justice in court while simultaneously litigating in the
media. The rule against parallel adjudication is essential to preserving
judicial integrity, fair proceedings, and respect for all branches of
government,” she said.
Responding to criticisms over her December 9, 2023, social
media post acknowledging Akpabio at a public event — a day after the alleged
harassment — as well as photos from the Inter-Parliamentary Union Session in
Geneva (March 24–25, 2024), she said such civil interactions do not negate
misconduct.
“Outward civility at public
events does not imply consent or nullify claims of misconduct. Interpreting it
otherwise minimizes the seriousness of sexual harassment, especially when it
involves power dynamics in the workplace,” she explained.
She also denied receiving previous letters from Agbakoba and said her silence was guided by legal advice and respect for the lis pendens doctrine (the principle that matters already before the court should not be debated elsewhere).
Akpoti-Uduaghan clarified that two separate legal cases are currently before competent courts:
Suit No. CV/816/25 (Unoma
Godswill Akpabio v. Natasha Akpoti-Uduaghan, High Court of the FCT), which
involves claims of defamation and sexual harassment and seeks ₦250 billion in
damages.
Suit No. FHC/ABJ/CS/384/2025
(Natasha Akpoti-Uduaghan v. Clerk of the National Assembly & Others,
Federal High Court, Abuja), which challenges her referral to the Senate
Committee on Ethics without fair hearing, her six-month suspension, and the
withdrawal of her entitlements.
She emphasized that only one of the suits directly concerns the sexual
harassment allegations, and that the court, not the press, is the proper forum
for resolution.
Agbakoba, in a press briefing in Lagos on Tuesday, had insisted that
Akpoti-Uduaghan failed to address contradictions in her allegations —
specifically her public praise of Akpabio on December 9, 2023, following the
alleged incident on December 8. He noted that she deleted the post rather than
clarifying it.
In his letter dated April 22, 2025, Agbakoba stated, “Instead of
addressing the contradictions in your allegations, you deleted your social
media post. This raises serious concerns.”
0 Comments