Tuesday, December 03, 2024 - A former Commissioner in Imo State, Dr Fabian Ihekweme, has filed a N5 million lawsuit against the Nigerian Police Force before a Federal High Court in Abuja over alleged gross violations of his fundamental human rights.
In the suit marked Suit No. FHC/ABI/CS/1809/2024, the plaintiff seeks an
order of perpetual injunction restraining the police from further arrest,
detention, intimidation, assault and harassment over frivolous and
unsubstantiated allegations concerning his fundamental rights to freedom of
expression.
He also wants an order of the court compelling and directing the
defendants to immediately release or grant him bail, pending investigation or
charge him to court, as stipulated in sections 35(4) and (5) and 36 (1) of the
1999 Constitution.
He is seeking a declaration that his arrest on November 28 in Abuja in a
Gestapo manner by the police in Imo State constitutes an infringement of his
fundamental human rights and that his continuous detention by the police
amounts to a violation of his fundamental human rights.
He equally wants the court to declare that denying him access to his
team of lawyers by the police since November 28 when he was arrested in Abuja
and taken to Owerri violates his fundamental human rights and thus award him N5
million as damages against the police for alleged harassment, assault, and
illegal detention.
An affidavit of urgency deposed by the wife of the plaintiff, Mrs
Ihekweme Excel Fabian, said the plaintiff is managing a severe health condition
and his continuous detention without access to medicare will worsen his health
condition and endanger his life.
“That the applicant is now suffering double jeopardy of unlawful
detention and an imminent health risk that could endanger his life,” she
averred and further stated the constitution provides for rights to a fair trial
within a reasonable time.
She said the applicant ought to have been released on administrative
bail or charged to court at least two days after his arrest, as provided by the
Constitution and stated that the conduct of the respondents is arbitrary,
illegal, unconstitutional, harsh, oppressive and void.
0 Comments