Thursday, August 27, 2026 - Cancer cases are set to rise 67 per cent by 2050, according to the latest GLOBOCAN report, which highlights a sharp increase in the global cancer burden alongside deep inequalities in prevention, early detection, treatment, and surveillance.
The report recorded 20.6 million new cancer cases and 9.8
million deaths worldwide in 2024. Latest estimates from the International
Agency for Research on Cancer (IARC), the World Health Organization’s
specialised cancer agency, project that annual new cancer cases could reach 34
million by 2050, a 67 per cent increase from 2024 levels.
Over the same period, annual cancer deaths are projected to
rise to 17.5 million, an increase of nearly 80 per cent.
Released to mark IARC’s 60th anniversary, the GLOBOCAN 2024
report provides a global assessment of cancer incidence and mortality across
countries, regions, age groups, and sexes.
Of the 20.6 million new cases recorded in 2024, men
accounted for 10.6 million and women for 10 million.
Men also accounted for 56 per cent of the 9.8 million cancer
deaths, while women accounted for 44 per cent.
The figures reflect the disproportionate impact of cancer on
men, with one in nine men and one in 13 women dying from the disease. This
disparity stems from variations in the types of cancer affecting men and women,
alongside generally poorer prognoses for cancers predominantly affecting men.
Significant geographical disparities persist across the
globe, driven by population size, ageing, risk factor exposure, and unequal
access to healthcare services. China accounts for approximately one in four
cancer cases and one in four cancer deaths worldwide.
Meanwhile, Europe, home to 9.2 per cent of the global
population, accounts for more than 20 per cent of global cancer incidence.
Standardised incidence rates vary as much as threefold between countries, while
mortality rates differ by up to fivefold
The highest incidence rates were recorded in countries including Australia and Denmark, whereas some of the lowest rates were observed in parts of sub-Saharan Africa. Conversely, mortality rates peaked in Eastern Europe and Melanesia. Specific high-burden regions include liver cancer in Mongolia and cervical cancer in Zimbabwe.
Addressing these variations highlights not only differing risks of developing cancer, but also widespread disparities in early detection, diagnosis, and access to effective care.
Maintaining current absolute numbers of cases and deaths
would require a 2 per cent annual decline in both incidence and mortality, a
target current global trends fall far short of reaching.
Lung cancer remains the leading cause of both cancer
incidence and mortality globally, serving as the primary cause of cancer death
in 89 countries, particularly among men.
Breast cancer remains one of the most frequently diagnosed
cancers worldwide. Excluding China, it is the most commonly diagnosed cancer
across all levels of the Human Development Index.
Among women specifically, breast cancer is the most
frequently diagnosed cancer in 164 countries and the leading cause of cancer
death in 122 countries. Meanwhile, prostate cancer is the most common diagnosis
among men in 123 countries, driven in part by increased diagnostic testing.
Cancer patterns globally are increasingly shaped by sex,
economic development, demographic ageing, and infections. In sub-Saharan
Africa, breast and cervical cancers combined account for more than half of all
cancers among women, while infection-related cancers drive roughly 80 per cent
of preventable cases in the region.
Continued tobacco use, population ageing, and structural
inequalities in cancer control risk driving further increases in incidence and
mortality.
Although mortality rates have begun to drop in some
high-income nations due to targeted prevention, earlier detection, and improved
treatments, overall incidence continues to climb in most settings.
Underlying these challenges is a critical deficiency in
global data collection: currently, only one in three countries reports
high-quality cancer incidence data, and only one in four maintains reliable
mortality data

0 Comments