Tuesday, July 14, 2026 - A Magistrate Court I, sitting at Amawbia near Awka, Anambra State capital, on Monday ordered the remand of a blogger and publisher of Igbo Times Magazine and INews, Ejike Ofoegbu, over allegations bordering on criminal defamation against the Anambra State Governor, Prof. Chukwuma Soludo, members of his family, and his son, Ozonna.
The defendant, who is facing a three-count charge of
identity theft, defamation and cyber stalking, was ordered to be remanded at
the Awka Correctional Centre by Chief Magistrate C.O. Ezekwere, who presided
over the matter.
The remand order followed an ex parte application moved by
the prosecuting counsel, A.A. Nwanri, in suit No. M/W/3136/2026, seeking an
order remanding the defendant at the Awka Correctional Centre, pending the
conclusion of police investigations and the transmission of the case file to
the Office of the Attorney General and Commissioner for Justice for legal
advice.
Appearing before the court were A.A. Nwanri for the
prosecution, the Chief Security Officer to the Governor, O.K. Nkuma, and
Inspector Tochukwu Echemagu of the D-4 Section, State Criminal Investigation
Department, Awka, in support of the ex parte application for the defendant’s
remand.
The prosecution further alleged that the defendant published
several false and defamatory reports, including claims that Soludo had publicly
disowned his son; that Ozonna allegedly described his father as “a drunkard who
beat my mom”; and that the governor engaged in a “drinking competition” with a
serving minister of the Federal Republic of Nigeria.
The prosecution maintained that these publications were
entirely false, malicious, and deliberately designed to injure the reputation,
character, and public image of the Governor and members of his family.
According to the prosecution, the defendant’s conduct
constituted offences under the Cybercrimes (Prohibition, Prevention, etc.) Act,
2015, as amended by the Cybercrimes (Prohibition, Prevention, etc.) (Amendment)
Act, 2024, particularly Section 24(1)(b) relating to cyberstalking and Section
38 concerning identity theft and impersonation.
The court also relied on Sections 373 and 375 of the
Criminal Code Act, which criminalise the publication of defamatory matter.
In his ruling, the presiding Magistrate, C.O. Ezekwere,
ordered that the original police case file, together with all exhibits relating
to the matter, be compiled and transmitted to the Office of the Attorney
General and Commissioner for Justice, Anambra State, for legal advice.
Ezekwere further directed that the complete record of
proceedings before the Magistrate Court be forwarded to the Director of Public
Prosecutions, Awka.
The magistrate held that the court lacked jurisdiction to
entertain or determine the substantive charges against the defendant.
Consequently, he declined jurisdiction over the bail
application and advised the defendant to approach the High Court of Anambra
State, Awka Judicial Division, for the determination of any application for
bail.
In the enrolled order, Magistrate Ezekwere said, “The Chief
Security Officer to the Anambra State Government, O.K. Nkuma, and Inspector
Tochukwu Echemagu, attached to the State Criminal Investigation Department of
the Anambra State Command of the Nigeria Police Force, are hereby entered into
recognisance in the sum of ₦50,000.00
each to testify on behalf of the prosecution before the Anambra State High
Court of Justice whenever required, until the final determination of this
matter.
“It is further ordered that the prosecution shall compile
and transmit the original police case file, together with all exhibits relating
to this matter, to the Office of the Attorney General and Ministry of Justice,
Awka.
“The prosecution is equally directed to transmit the
original record of proceedings in this case, alongside the original police case
file, to the Office of the Director of Public Prosecutions, Awka, for legal
advice.”
The court, however, advised the defendant to approach the
High Court in Awka for bail, noting that the Magistrate Court lacked the
jurisdiction to entertain the matter.
“The application for bail before this Court is hereby
refused for want of jurisdiction. The matter is hereby adjourned to July 27,
2026 for a report on compliance with the court’s orders while the defendant
will be remanded at the correctional centre pending further hearing,” the
magistrate stated.
It was earlier recalled that the defendant had previously
issued a public apology and full retraction in respect of the disputed
publications.
Notwithstanding the apology and retraction, the prosecution
proceeded with the present criminal proceedings, maintaining that the defendant
remains criminally liable under the Cybercrimes Act and the Criminal Code for
alleged offences including criminal defamation, cyberstalking, identity theft,
and impersonation.
The prosecution contended that the subsequent retraction and
apology neither extinguish nor absolve any criminal liability arising from the
alleged commission of the offences and therefore do not preclude prosecution
where the State considers that sufficient evidence exists to sustain the
charges.

0 Comments