Saturday, June 27, 2026 - Two women who allege they were victims of Jeffrey Epstein believe he had assistance in operating his s3x trafficking network and are now pointing to former Victoria's Secret CEO Les Wexner as an enabler, according to court documents obtained by TMZ.
The two Jane Does have filed a lawsuit against Wexner,
accusing him of facilitating Epstein's crimes by providing him with financial
resources, access to his mansion, and an air of credibility.
The complaint, filed on Thursday, states that both women
were 17 years old, and therefore minors, when they were s3xually assaulted at
Epstein's Manhattan mansion on East 71st Street. They claim Wexner purchased
the property in 1989 before transferring it to Epstein for a fraction of its
value.
According to the lawsuit, the young women were hired to give
massages to Epstein at the mansion. Jane Doe 1 alleges that during one session,
Epstein inserted his hand into her underwear and "digitally penetrated her
without her consent." She was so distressed that she ran to the bathroom
in tears, the documents state. The suit also claims that during subsequent
visits, Epstein "fondled her breasts" and "groped her
genitals" without her consent.
Jane Doe 2 claims she was forced to massage Epstein's penis
alongside other girls while he allegedly "touched their breasts and
genitals" without their consent.
The lawsuit argues that Epstein could not have carried out
the assaults without Wexner's backing, alleging that Wexner gave Epstein at
least $200 million between 1987 and 2007. The documents also state that Wexner
provided Epstein with the private plane he used to transport his victims.
The Jane Does further claim Wexner granted Epstein
"power and prestige" by appointing him as a trustee and director of
The Wexner Foundation. They argue that Epstein's trafficking operation would
not have been possible without the former Victoria's Secret owner.
The women are suing Epstein's estate for gender-motivated
violence and Wexner for enabling that violence, seeking unspecified damages.
0 Comments