Thursday, March, 5 2026 - The African Democratic Congress (ADC) has alleged that the administration of Bola Tinubu is applying selective justice in the handling of legal proceedings involving former Kaduna State governor Nasir El-Rufai and former Attorney General of the Federation Abubakar Malami.
The opposition party expressed concern over what it
described as the sequence of arrests, transfers between law enforcement
agencies, and the speed of enforcement actions against the two politicians.
According to the ADC, the pattern has fueled public debate about whether the
rule of law is being applied impartially across political divides.
In a statement issued by the party’s National Publicity
Secretary, Bolaji Abdullahi, the ADC said it had been closely monitoring
developments affecting its members.
“The ADC has been monitoring the ongoing legal cases
involving two of our leaders, Mr. Malami, former Attorney General of the
Federation and Minister of Justice from Kebbi State, and El-Rufai, the former
Governor of Kaduna State,” the statement read.
“As a law-abiding party, it is important to state for the
record that the ADC believes no citizen, regardless of stature or past office,
is above the law.
“In a constitutional democracy where the law is seen to
operate selectively, it becomes imperative to insist, firmly and without
apology, that justice must be applied evenly, transparently, and without
political calculation, particularly in cases such as those involving Malami and
El-Rufai, where the manner, speed, and sequence of enforcement actions have
understandably raised serious public concern about consistency and fairness.”
The party questioned the repeated movement of the two men
between different law enforcement agencies while investigations are reportedly
ongoing.
“The movement of Malami and El-Rufai from the custody of one
law enforcement agency to another, in rapid succession, while investigations
appear ongoing, has raised profound public concern,” the statement continued.
“In a democracy that is supposed to be governed by the rule
of law, custody must follow credible, well-prepared charges, not precede them
in a manner that creates the appearance of pre-trial punishment.
“If there is evidence against Malami, prosecute him
transparently. If there is evidence against El-Rufai, present it before the
court and allow the law to take its course.”
The ADC also referenced what it described as a contrasting
high-profile case involving allegations of passport forgery, international
conspiracy, and impersonation. It noted that in that matter, the defendants
pleaded not guilty, were granted bail, and court proceedings are progressing
swiftly.
“These are not minor procedural questions. They touch on
issues of national integrity and international credibility. Yet, in that case,
the accused persons pleaded not guilty, were granted bail, and the matter is
proceeding with dispatch before the court.
“They are, therefore, presumed innocent under the
Constitution until proven otherwise in a fair and competent court of law. That
presumption should not be treated as a courtesy, but as a constitutional
guarantee.”
Reaffirming its position, the party vowed to support its
members through the legal process.

0 Comments