Monday, March, 9 2026 - The Court of Appeal of Nigeria has affirmed the conviction and prison sentence handed to a former senior officer of the Nigerian Army, Major General Umar Mohammed, over the diversion of billions of naira belonging to the army’s property company.
In a judgement released on Monday, the appellate court
upheld the earlier decision of a Special Court Martial which found the
ex-general guilty of stealing and mismanaging funds belonging to Nigerian Army
Properties Limited (NAPL).
The ruling also sustained the order directing him to return
more than ₦4 billion traced to the illegal transactions.
According to the Certified True Copy of the judgement, the
three-man panel of justices rejected Mohammed’s appeal challenging both the
jurisdiction of the military tribunal and the outcome of its trial. The judges
ruled that the court martial acted within the law and relied on credible
evidence to reach its verdict.
The former Group Managing Director of the army-owned firm
was originally tried by the military tribunal on October 10, 2023. He faced
multiple charges bordering on stealing and criminal misappropriation of company
funds during his tenure at the organization.
After the trial, the court martial dismissed him from
service and sentenced him to imprisonment. It also ordered him to refund
2,099,700 dollars and ₦1.65 billion to the company as part of the penalties
imposed for the offences.
Unhappy with the decision, Mohammed filed an appeal in
February 2025, asking the appellate court to overturn the judgement. In the
suit marked CA/ABJ/CR/383/2025, he argued that the conviction was based on weak
and unreliable evidence.
However, the appellate court disagreed.
The panel, comprising Justices Abba Mohammed, Okon Abang and
Eberechi Nyesom-Wike, ruled that the prosecution successfully proved its case
before the military tribunal.
The judges also faulted the defence presented by the former
general. They said his explanations during the trial were inconsistent and
could not be relied upon.
Part of the judgement pointed to contradictions in his
testimony. Mohammed had insisted during the proceedings that Nigerian Army
Properties Limited did not operate berthing services. The court, however, noted
that documentary records earlier authored by him showed the company was indeed
involved in such operations.
The justices held that the conflicting statements weakened
his credibility and reinforced the findings of the court martial.
As a result, the appellate court affirmed the conviction and
sentence on most of the charges earlier established by the military tribunal.
Only counts relating to alleged forgery were set aside.
The legal troubles facing the former officer extend beyond
the criminal conviction.
In August 2025, Justice Dehinde Dipeolu of the Federal High
Court of Nigeria sitting in Lagos ordered the final forfeiture of shares worth
more than ₦5 billion linked to Mohammed and businessman Kayode Filani.
The shares, totaling 245,568,137 units, were said to have
been purchased using funds suspected to be proceeds of illegal activities
during Mohammed’s leadership of the army property firm.
The forfeiture followed an application filed by the Economic
and Financial Crimes Commission (EFCC). The anti-graft agency told the court
that investigations had already established that the funds used for the
investment were illegally obtained.
EFCC counsel, Hanatu Kofanaisa, informed the court that a
Special Court Martial had previously convicted the ex-general on 14 out of 18
counts relating to stealing and financial misconduct.
She further stated that the commission complied with all
legal requirements for final forfeiture, including public notification through
newspaper publication. No individual or organisation came forward to challenge
the claim.
Justice Dipeolu subsequently ruled that the EFCC had proven
its case. The court then ordered that the shares be permanently forfeited to
the Federal Government in favour of Nigerian Army Properties Limited.
The forfeiture application was filed under Section 44(2)(b)
of the 1999 Constitution and Section 17 of the Advance Fee Fraud and Other
Fraud Related Offences Act of 2006.
The latest judgement by the Court of Appeal effectively
brings to a close Mohammed’s attempt to overturn his conviction and reinforces
the earlier disciplinary action taken by the military authorities.

0 Comments