Friday, February 6, 2026 - An unnamed Premier League footballer reportedly challenged his club after growing uneasy that repeated promotional exposure during the Rainbow Laces period could lead to him being “perceived as gay.”
The issue has emerged as the Premier League launches a new
inclusion campaign aimed at supporting LGBTQ+ people in football.
According to a report by The Athletic, the player appeared
on the front of his club’s matchday programme during the Rainbow Laces campaign
for two consecutive seasons and became concerned about how fans and the public
might interpret this visibility.
The concern surfaced against the backdrop of changes to the
league’s approach to LGBTQ+ campaigns. The Premier League has ended its
long-running partnership with Stonewall, meaning captains are no longer
required to wear rainbow armbands, and players are not obliged to use rainbow
laces or pride-themed warm-up kits.
Instead, the league is exploring alternative symbols of
support, including the possible introduction of a pride-themed match ball in
future seasons. This year’s dedicated gameweek, scheduled between 6 and 12
February, is considered too soon for that change to be implemented.
The shift follows reported reluctance from some players
across the Premier League and English Football League to take part in previous
initiatives. Last season, Manchester United scrapped plans to wear a
pride-themed Adidas jacket ahead of a match with Everton after defender
Noussair Mazraoui declined to wear it.
Similarly, Ipswich Town captain Sam Morsy opted not to wear
a rainbow armband, citing his religious beliefs. The Athletic report says the
unnamed player’s complaint was not about opposing LGBTQ+ inclusion, but about
being mischaracterised, with the player worried he would be seen as gay rather
than as an ally.
As part of the revamped campaign, the Premier League has
partnered with London-based marketing agency Nomad Studio to promote inclusion
while also strengthening internal support systems for players and staff seeking
help on LGBTQ+-related issues.

0 Comments