Tuesday, January 27, 2026 - A Federal High Court sitting in Lagos has awarded N210m in damages against Airtel Networks Limited for the unlawful use of a musical work titled “Nigeria Go Survive.”
Justice Ibrahim Kala, while delivering judgment on Monday in
suit no. FHC/L/CS/1822/2022, filed by the producer of the song, Veno Marioghae
Mbanefo, held that Airtel’s use of the work without licence or authorisation
amounted to copyright infringement.
Justice Kala said, “It is hereby declared that the
defendant’s engaging in the restricted acts in the use of the plaintiff’s
musical work titled ‘Nigeria Go Survive’ or any substantial part of it for
advertisement, promotion, and telemarketing of its business, products and
services to the millions of its subscribers or customers without licence and/or
authorisation amounts to infringement of the copyright of the plaintiff in the
work.”
The judge awarded N200m as general damages and the sum of
N10m, as cost of action, bringing the total award to N210m.
“The sum of N200m is awarded as general damages against the
defendant and in favour of the plaintiff for the loss occasioned by the
infringement of her copyright,” the court held.
In addition, the court granted both mandatory and perpetual
injunctions against Airtel.
Justice Kala ordered: “An order of mandatory injunction is
hereby given prohibiting the defendant, its management, agents, servants,
privies, successors-in-title and assignees from reproducing the Plaintiff’s
musical work titled ‘Nigeria Go Survive’ or any substantial part of it from its
list of songs for advertising, business, telemarketing and promotional purposes
forthwith.”
The court further restrained the telecoms company from any
future unauthorized use of the work.
“An order of perpetual injunction is hereby granted
restraining the defendant from further engaging in the restricted acts in the
use of the plaintiff’s musical work without licence and/or authorization of the
plaintiff,” the judge added.
Mbanefo, through her legal team led by Clement Onwvenwunor
(SAN), had asked the court to declare that Airtel’s use of the song without
crediting her as author and without consent breached her statutory rights under
the Copyright Act.
She also sought damages and, in the alternative, an order
directing Airtel to account for profits allegedly made from the infringement
under the supervision of the Nigerian Communications Commission.
Airtel, represented by a legal team led by Babatunde Amoo,
had urged the court to dismiss the suit.
However, Justice Kala, after reviewing the exhibits and
submissions of counsel, held that, “The plaintiff, having proved her claim on
the balance of probability against the defendant, has established a meritorious
case.”
The court refused the plaintiff’s alternative prayer seeking
an account of profits but upheld her substantive claims on infringement,
damages and injunctions.

0 Comments