Saturday, January 24, 2026 - The House of Representatives Minority Caucus Ad-hoc Committee on Tax Laws on Friday, January 23, said it has confirmed that illegal alterations were made to some tax reform laws passed by the National Assembly and assented to by President Bola Tinubu, raising concerns over legislative integrity and possible constitutional breaches
The committee disclosed this in its interim report
investigating allegations of discrepancies between the versions of tax laws
passed by parliament and those later published in the official gazette. The
controversy was triggered after a member of the House, Abdulsamad Dasuki,
raised an alarm during plenary over the circulation of an “authorised” version
of the tax laws that differed from what lawmakers approved.
Following public outcry, the Minority Caucus issued a
statement on December 28, 2025, pledging to “unconditionally protect the
independence of the Legislature and our democracy,” and warning that the
imposition of fake laws on Nigerians amounted to an attack on the
constitutional role of the National Assembly.
To probe the allegations, the caucus, led by Kingsley
Chinda, on January 2, 2026 constituted a seven-member ad-hoc committee chaired
by Afam Ogene. Other members include Aliyu Garu (Bauchi), Stanley Adedeji
(Oyo), Ibe Osonwa (Abia), Marie Ebikake (Bayelsa), Shehu Fagge (Kano) and Gaza
Jonathan (Nasarawa). The panel was mandated to establish the facts surrounding
the alleged manipulation of the tax laws.
In a statement signed by Ogene, the committee said that on
January 3, 2026, the House, through its spokesman Akintunde Rotimi, announced
that the Speaker, Abbas Tajudeen, directed the public release of the four tax
reform Acts signed into law by the president. The Speaker also ordered an
internal verification and the immediate release of Certified True Copies (CTCs)
to dispel doubts and preserve the sanctity of the legislature
The Acts involved are the Nigeria Tax Act, 2025; Nigeria Tax
Administration Act, 2025; National Revenue Service (Establishment) Act, 2025;
and Joint Revenue Board (Establishment) Act, 2025. The Clerk to the National
Assembly was instructed to work with the Federal Government Printing Press to
ensure accuracy, conformity and uniformity.
In its findings, the committee said a comparison of the CTCs
released by the House with the gazetted versions already in circulation
confirmed that alterations had indeed been made, particularly in the Nigeria
Tax Administration Act, 2025. It noted that three different versions of the
document were in circulation, describing this as evidence of procedural
anomalies that “illegally encroached on the core mandate of the National
Assembly.”
The committee identified discrepancies in reporting
thresholds under the Nigeria Tax Administration Act, saying that while the
version passed by the National Assembly set thresholds at ₦50 million for
individuals and ₦100 million for companies, the gazetted version reduced them
to ₦25 million for individuals and altered thresholds for companies. It
described this as a clear case of the executive undermining legislative
authority to draw more taxpayers into the net.
It also said the gazetted version introduced new subsections
requiring taxpayers to deposit 20 per cent of disputed tax amounts before
appealing Tax Appeal Tribunal decisions to the High Court, provisions which
were absent in the version passed by lawmakers. Further concerns were raised
over expanded enforcement powers, including arrest and asset sales without
court orders, as well as changes to the definition of federal taxes that
removed petroleum income tax and VAT from federal administration.
On the National Revenue Service (Establishment) Act, the
panel said provisions empowering the National Assembly to summon officials and
demand reports were deleted in the gazetted version, undermining parliamentary
oversight and the doctrine of checks and balances. It also cited alterations
mandating tax computations for petroleum operations in US dollars rather than
the currency of transaction approved by parliament.
Given the scope of the discrepancies, the committee said the
evidence was sufficient to warrant a deeper investigation. It requested an
extension of time to conduct a more thorough examination to ensure
accountability for what it described as an affront to the legislature and
Nigeria’s democracy.
President Tinubu assented to the four tax reform bills in
June 2025. The presidency had said the new laws were intended to transform tax
administration, boost revenue generation, improve the business environment and
attract domestic and foreign investment.

0 Comments