Saturday, November 23, 2024 -A Federal High Court in Abuja, on Friday, ordered the remand of 109 foreigners, charged over allegations bordering on cybercrime, in Kuje and Suleja Correctional Centres.
Justice Ekerete Akpan gave the order following an application by one of
the defence counsel, James Onoja, SAN, for an adjournment to allow the
prosecution to reflect the defendants’ names correctly on the charge sheet.
The foreigners, who are said to be citizens of China, Indonesia,
Vietnam, Philippines, Thailand, Brazil, Malaysia and Myanmar, were recently
arrested by the police.
They were apprehended in their residence at Plot 1906, Cadestral Zone
807, Katampe District of Abuja, where they were said to be engaging in
cybercrime by allegedly promoting “a fraudulent and unregistered gaming
platform.”
In a six-count charge, marked: FHC/ABJ/CR/599/2024 filed in the name of
the Inspector-General (I-G) of Police, the foreigners were charged with
cybercrime, money laundering and unlawfully residing in Nigeria.
At the resumed hearing on Friday, Onoja informed the court that while
conducting Know-Your-Customer (KYC) procedures for his clients, he discovered
that their actual names were not reflected on the charge sheet.
“This information came to light when we were discussing the possible
terms of bail for the defendants.
“We told them that the court would ask for their travel documents, and
they said the names on the charge sheet were not their names,” he said.
The senior lawyer said he had discussed the matter with the prosecution
lawyer, A.A. Egwu.
He said they requested the defendants’ travel documents so that their
proper names could be reflected on the charge sheet.
He emphasised that it was the defendant’s responsibility to provide
their correct travel documents for the plea and trial to proceed smoothly.
Onoja, therefore, proposed that the arraignment be adjourned in the
interest of justice.
Egwu, who appeared for the police, responded that the court could make
an order for the defendants’ respective embassies to provide their travel
documents.
“We do not oppose the request for an adjournment,” he said.
0 Comments