This The judgment, issued by Justice Joyce Abdulmalik, restricts
Governor Siminalayi Fubara from accessing allocations until the state’s 2024
budget is presented before a legitimate Rivers House of Assembly.
Justice Abdulmalik’s ruling declared that Fubara’s previous budget
presentations were unconstitutional, as they bypassed the Martin Amaewhule-led
Rivers House of Assembly, which is aligned with FCT Minister Nyesom Wike.
Fubara, a former political ally of Wike, is alleged to have authorized
disbursements without proper legislative approval. The ruling also restrains
the CBN, the Accountant-General of the Federation, and the state’s bank
partners from enabling access to the state's funds until compliance with
constitutional guidelines is established.
Rivers State’s Commissioner for Information and Communications, Joseph
Johnson, expressed confidence that the Appeal Court would overturn the ruling.
He highlighted issues within the High Court’s procedures, including the judge’s
refusal to allow certain council chairmen to join the case as defendants.
Johnson emphasized the government's position that the judgment, if upheld,
could affect local government workers and essential services across the state.
Following the judgment, prominent political figures, including former
Vice President Atiku Abubakar, and representatives from the Peoples Democratic
Party, expressed concern over the judiciary’s increasing involvement in
political disputes. Atiku condemned what he described as politically influenced
rulings, cautioning that the judiciary's reputation was at risk.
Pro-Wike factions and supporters of the Amaewhule-led Assembly
celebrated the decision as a reinforcement of the rule of law. Meanwhile, civil
society organizations also weighed in, with the Centre for Accountability and
Open Leadership arguing that Fubara’s unilateral budget actions undermined
democratic principles.
As Rivers State moves to appeal the decision, the judiciary’s role in
political crises continues to stir debate nationwide. Both sides await the
Appeal Court’s response, which is expected to clarify the balance of power
between state governments and the federal judiciary.
0 Comments