Sunday, July 7, 2024 - Socialite, Ismaila Mustapha, aka Mompha has responded after the Economic and Financial Crimes Commission EFCC asked him to prove his allegations that they are the most corrupt agency.
Last week, a witness in the money
laundering trial of Mompha, alleged that N35bn was found in Mompha’s
accounts.
Reacting to the witness's comment,
Mompha via his Instagram page, called the commission "The most useless and
corrupt Nigeria government agency." Last night, the agency released a
statement demanding that Mompha release proof to show they are corrupt
Mompha has now responded. In a
statement released, the socialite said the fact that the commission responded
to him shows how it is “useless and jobless.”
Read the statement below
‘’My attention has once again been
drawn to the social media tantrum of the EFCC demanding that I prove corruption
allegation against them. The fact that the commission, particularly their
chairman could stoop so low to respond to my post shows clearly how useless,
jobless the efcc is and how they waste taxpayers money on exchanging banters on
social media.
Now, I won’t bother to dwell on the trumped
up charges that was cooked up against me for personal gains by some of their
corrupt officials and mere media trial because the fact speaks for itself but
will rather dwell on how useless this commission under the leadership of the
Chairman Cos why will the efcc on Friday, 5th of July, 2024 step outside of
their constitutional duty and litter armed men on the streets of Lagos and
Abuja all in the name of preventing citizens from protesting against the
corruption being displayed by the Efcc, thereby infringing on their fundamental
right to lawfully protest and preventing innocent citizens from going about
their lawful business.
Another
example is beating up innocent citizens during their illegal and night raids (
we all saw what happened in Ondo state and recently in Lagos which the
commission reluctantly admitted on its social media platform)
Now back to
my case, the efcc claimed they have “overwhelming evidence of my involvement in
money laundering”, however the question is; who is this faceless person I
laundered money for?; does the person not have a name?; did you mention the
name of the person in the trumped up charges before the court?.
0 Comments